Kur tu įžvelgi tą "argumentum at hominem"? Pareikalavau tik pagrįsti savo frazę. 2011.03.25 11:52, sonca rašė: > O Tu sugebi diskututi be "argumentum at hominem"? > > "RaR" <RaR@lt.lt> wrote in message news:imhoad$roc$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > Parodyk, kuris teiginys neteisingas, ir pateiksiu daug rimtesnių > šaltinių, jei sugebėsi juos skaityti. O šiaip jau wikipedia yra daug > rimtesnis šaltinis praktiškai už bet kurį Lietuvos žiniasklaidos > šaltinį. Nekalbant jau apie internetines blevyzgas perspausdinantį > sarmatas.lt > > > > > > 2011.03.25 11:42, sonca rašė: >> O wikipedia yra labai rimtas ir patikimas šaltinis. >> >> "RaR" <RaR@lt.lt> wrote in message >> news:imhm96$o87$2@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> p.s. >> >> Problema dėl sėklų nebuvimo iš viso neegzistuoja, nes tokia GM >> technologija sukurta, ją nupirko Monsanto, bet ji dar nekomercializuota. >> Taigi, tame straipsnelyje parašytas MELAS. tai vėl ta pati wikipedia, >> ištrauka iš straipsnelio apie GMO: >> >> >> "An often cited controversy is a "Technology Protection" technology >> dubbed 'Terminator'.[60] This uncommercialized technology would allow >> the production of first generation crops that would not generate seeds >> in the second generation because the plants yield sterile seeds. The >> patent for this so-called "terminator" gene technology is owned by Delta >> and Pine Land Company and the United States Department of Agriculture. >> Delta and Pine Land was bought by Monsanto Company in August 2006. >> Similarly, the hypothetical trait-specific Genetic Use Restriction >> Technology, also known as 'Traitor' or 'T-GURT', requires application of >> a chemical to genetically modified crops to reactivate engineered >> traits.[60][61] This technology is intended both to limit the spread of >> genetically engineered plants, and to require farmers to pay yearly to >> reactivate the genetically engineered traits of their crops. Genetic Use >> Restriction Technology is under development by companies including >> Monsanto and AstraZeneca. >> >> In addition to the commercial protection of proprietary technology in >> self-pollinating crops such as soybean (a generally contentious issue), >> another purpose of the terminator gene is to prevent the escape of >> genetically modified traits from cross-pollinating crops into wild-type >> species by sterilizing any resultant hybrids. Some environmentalist >> groups, while considering outcrossing of GM plants dangerous, felt the >> technology would prevent re-use of seed by farmers growing such >> terminator varieties in the developing world and was ostensibly a means >> to exercise patent claims.[citation needed] However other environmental >> groups welcomed the terminator gene as a means of preventing GM crops >> from mixing with natural crops.[citation needed] >> >> Hybrid seeds were commonly used in the developed countries long before >> the introduction of GM crops. Hybrid seeds cannot be saved, so >> purchasing new seed every year is already a standard agricultural >> practice. >> >> There are technologies evolving which contain the transgene by >> biological means and still can provide fertile seeds using fertility >> restorer functions. Such methods are being developed by several EU >> research programs, among them Transcontainer and Co-Extra." >> >> >> Ir, kaip jau minėjau, jau seniai pilna yra tradicinių hibridinių >> veislių, kurios neduoda sėklų. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011.03.25 10:47, fkt rašė: >>> >>> "RaR"<RaR@lt.lt> wrote in message >>> news:imhkbi$ksu$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> >>>> na visų pirma derliui sumažėjus jo nelieka pelnui, bet kažkiek sėklom >>>> lieka. >>>> tu taip jau labai supranti arba juoda arba balta. >>>> arba derlius su dideliu pelnu, arba išvis nulis. >>> >>> Jeigu derliaus nulis - tai ir iš nesterilių veislių sėklos nulis. Jei ne >>> nulis - tai iš nesterilių veislių derliaus lieka bent sėklai, o iš >>> sterilių - už parduotą produkciją gali gauti pinigų bent sėklai pirkti. >>> >>> >>> >>> nu tai gal kvotos kokios nors, kad tiek kiek lieka sėklai nieks >>> nesupirkinėja. >>> pas mus gi panašiai kad po šimtą kg runkelių nepriduosi. >>> >>> >>> O šiaip jau niekur neradau, kad BT medvilnė yra sterili. Beje, paskaityk >>> rimtesnių šaltinių su faktais ir nuorodomis kaip sėkmingai Indijoje >>> įdiegiama BT medvilnė. "Bt-Cotton in India: Remarkable Adoption and >>> Benefits" >>> http://www.fbae.org/2009/FBAE/website/our-position-bt-cotton.html. >>> >>> >>> hm, tada belieka mistika dėl smegenų poveikio dėl polinkio į >>> nusinuodyjimą :) >> >