On 2010.01.06 17:13, Cube wrote:
> KEdas wrote:
>> Bet neprošal dar būtų ir duotą wiki nuorodą paskaityti, kur ir ši
>> kritika sukritikuota. :)
>
> O tau reiktu paskaityti kokia nors kriminologijos knyga, kad suprastum,
> kad kiekvienas parasinejimas internete, tai dar ne teorija. Netgi tame
> paciame wikipedijos straipsnyje parasyta, kad kriminologai sito nelapaiko.
> Is esmes cia yra zurnalistinis triukas, kai paimamas teisingas faktas,
> bet jam pripaisoma visai ne ta priezastis.

Tai siūlai nieko nedaryti, nes policija dirba gerai?

O kaip kriminologai aiškina šį reiškinį?
Lowell, Massachusetts

In 2005, Harvard University and Suffolk University researchers worked 
with local police to identify 34 "crime hot spots" in Lowell, 
Massachusetts. In half of the spots, authorities cleared trash, fixed 
streetlights, enforced building codes, discouraged loiterers, made more 
misdemeanor arrests, and expanded mental health services and aid for the 
homeless. In the other half, there was no change to routine police service.

The areas that received additional attention experienced a 20% reduction 
in calls to the police. The study concluded that cleaning up the 
physical environment is more effective than misdemeanor arrests, and 
that increasing social services had no effect.