Firefox nebandziau, bet bent uz Chrome, tai Safari veikia geriau ant ios. 
Nebent religiniai isitikinimai neleidzia naudot.


"Bronco" <TRINTI_bronco.mail@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o87466$hke$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
> On 2017-02-17 12:02, budulis vulgaris wrote:
>> Ple, tikrai neleidžia:
>> https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/adblock-plus-abp-remove-ads/id1028871868?mt=8
>>
>
> O pabandyk Firefoxui surast :) Būtent tik Safariui ir yra. Ir aš visiškai 
> nenustebsiu, jog apple į tai kol kas žiūri "pro pirštus" tik Safario 
> populiarinimui, ir bet kurią akimirką tą adblocką užlenks, kai tik 
> obuoliui šaus į galvą.
>
> p.s.
>
>
> Anders J · 2015-10-05 23:08 · #
>
> Content blocking is only supported in iOS9 on 64 bit devices: “This 
> excludes the iPhone 4s, 5, and 5c; the iPad 2, 3rd-generation iPad, and 
> 4th-generation iPad; 1st-generation iPad mini; and the 5th-generation iPod 
> touch. All later devices work.
>
> ----------------
>
> Mikhail · 2015-10-02 16:05 · #
>
> Did you think about bypassing Apple’s 50000 rules limitation by releasing 
> different ABP apps for every supported country-specific EasyList?
> E.g. for Russian sites the efficiency of current ad-blocking is almost 
> non-existing, what is extremely upsetting, knowing how good ABP on other 
> platforms is.
>
> Reply from Felix Dahlke:
>
> We could register multiple content blockers to work around that 
> limitation, but we’ve refrained from that so far. We’re trying to reduce 
> the number of rules as much as possible first, we have some leeway there. 
> If nothing else works, we will probably resort to having multiple blockers 
> the user needs to enable.
>
> ---------------
>
>
>