Tikrai neziurek i grozi - va nupirkau toki http://www.computershopper.com/laptops/reviews/hp-pavilion-x360 Reikalavimai irgi buvo paprasti - grazus, mazas ir raudonas butu faina :) Realiai veikia kaip ir jau tuoj bus du metai - tik va islindo vienas rimtas bug'as batareika sh mala, tai veikia tai neveikia, tai ji yra tai tipo failed nesikrauna :( O batareika ten viduj ir nieks siaip atskiros neparduoda - reik uzsakinet, kainuoja gerai :( Teks prisiruost kartu ir daryt upgreida diska i ssd jei jau ardyti, kazkaip tenkina tai kas yra nes baisiai smarkiai nedirbama - biski ofisas, internetas, skype tai kaip ir per akis to kas yra. Bet kai paziuri kaip pasikrauna kaip vartos letai, o ardyt vistiek teks ta batarke uzsakius is hp atstovu kazkokiu lt, nes niekas kitas deja pasiulyt negali :( Taip, kad paziurek ir i praktiska puse ziurint keliu metu perspektyva, kad nebutu po poros metu dziaugsmu :) "bat0nas" <bat0nas.ok@gmail.com> wrote in message news:nqo6ud$37p$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > Ziauriai dekui. > Tokio mazdaug atsakymo ir reikejo. Panasu, kad sitie kompiuteriai tik > atrodo graziai. > > Pakelsime kartele iki i3-i5 ir kimbam narsyti is naujo. > > Dekui uz rekomendacijas. Pasiskaitysim. > > > > > On 2016.09.06 23:18, MRT wrote: >> >>> Cia kaip kam.. man sueidavo net celeron'ai, galima saipytis, >>> bet realiai dar paziureciau kas kuri lyginant su Core M fanless. >> >> fak .. vienas linkas taip ir liko neidetas: >> >> http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305CA-EHM1-Subnotebook-Review.154422.0.html >> >> >> Processor >> >> On paper, the m3 chip offers performance on par with previous-generation >> i3 CPUs (for example the Core i3-5010), which have a much higher TDP of >> 15 watts, but of course lack the extensive Turbo-Boost capabilities. In >> a passively-cooled notebook, actual performance depends on the >> implementation - and it turns out that the UX305CA can't keep what the >> m3-6Y30 promises: even very short load cycles resulted in a - sometimes >> very noticeable - reduction of the CPU performance. During the X264 >> video-encoding benchmark test, for example, the subnotebook showed a >> clear drop in the frame rate during the four iterations (pass 1, #1: >> 76.5 fps; pass 1, #4: 67.2 fps). The same CPU in the Microsoft Surface >> Pro 4 is capable of far better performance: while we recorded 1.79 >> points (multi) and 0.81 points (single) for the Cinebench R11.5 >> benchmark test, the Surface Pro 4 scored roughly 25 % higher (2.27 / >> 0.98 points). >> >> Stress Test >> >> With Prime95 active and the CPU pegged at nearly 100 % utilization, we >> saw an immediate rise in the CPU temperature from 34 degrees at idle to >> 68 degrees and then 70 degrees. The CPU core frequency dropped from the >> maximum of 2 GHz (both cores) to 1.8 and 1.7 GHz during the same time >> frame. Three additional minutes into the test, the temperate had >> decreased to 62 degrees with the CPU now fluctuating between 1.4 and 1.5 >> GHz; another 2 minutes later the temperature dropped to about 55 degrees >> with the CPU now only maintaining about 1.1 - 1.2 GHz. GPU stress with >> Furmark showed a similar picture <..> >> >> PS. Jei kazkas atrodys per daug negatyviai, tai tarkim viena karta >> senesniu pora i darba pirkomes komandiruotems.. kolege sau eme.. >> >> PSS. bent senesnieji ZIAURIAI peckiojasi.. >> cia bug'as by design, nes ASUS ikomplektavo skudura :D >> >