Tema: Re: Mainstream (in Film Studies)
Autorius: Junda
Data: 2009-06-02 10:23:39
vyraujanti kryptis?


On 2009.06.01 22:50, Viktorija wrote:
> Kaip lietuviskai butu "mainstream". Pagal prasme tai turetu buti vienas
> zodis, daiktavardis, nusakantis sroves pavadinima. Taip kaip
> siurrealizmas, taip ir "meinstrymas". Ar yra koks kitas zodis?
>
> populiari tendencija netinka, tam yra zodis "popular"
> masine kultura (kryptis) netinka, nes yra zodis "mass" culture/attitude
> siuolaikine irgi netinka, nes yra contemporary
>
> is vis, pagal mane turetu buti ne budvardis (populiari/masine/labiausiai
> paplitusi/etc) o kazkoks daiktavardis, sroves/tendencijos pavadinimas
>
> zemiau sakiniai su "mainstream"
>
>
> In the surrealist response to Hollywood, genre films were of particular
> significance because they could elude production codes that dominated
> the mainstream, but paradoxically it was the demise of the studio
> production line that put an end to the possibilities of the sort of
> cinema that would cast up these rich poetic possibilities in a whole
> range of different films.
>
> With the demise of the B movie, genre films were integrated into the
> mainstream, something which, along with a greater awareness of
> inter-textual elements in films among critics and increasingly among
> film makers as well, has combined to make the involuntary generation of
> poetry unlikely if not impossible.