Tema: Re: skalbenkiu firmos
Autorius: zalias
Data: 2009-12-21 21:31:31
keisiu, jei galesiu sau tai leisti. Ir jei tikrai pataps negrazi. :-)
apie skirtumus seno ir naujo. Lyginsiu savo 2 turetas masinas.
skiriasi: skalbiniu kiekis, Energijos kiekis, vandens kiekis, valdymo 
patogumas, dureliu dydis, garsas, dureliu atidarymo kampas, dizainas, 
surudijimo lygis + tai kad senoji sugedo jau 4 karta.
ITOGO: naujasis blomberg TOTALIAI tobulesnis uz senaji whirpool. ;-)

On 2009.12.21 21:05, tomassaki wrote:
> Tokie subjektyvus pastebejimai... Jei po 2-3 metu ir sita pataps
> negrazi, vel keisi? :)
> Man tai idomu kas tokio revoliucingo, inovatyvaus ir labai naujo
> skalbenkiu rinkoje ivyko tarkim nuo 2000 metu? Pats gi minejai, kad per
> 5 metus patobulejama zenkliai.
>
> "zalias" <pastas@kaimas.lt> wrote in message
> news:hgof27$d6e$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>> nesigilinau. sake blogai skalbia, blogai grezia, negrazi, reikia
>> naujos. Nemaciau reikalo moket 2000, tai nupirkau nauja, grazia, su
>> lemputem uz 1100. Sake sita ir skalbia ir grezia gerai. Namuose
>> ramybe, gyvenimas grazus.
>>
>>
>> On 2009.12.21 20:25, tomassaki wrote:
>>> Truputi nukrypsti i pievas. Klausimas: kuo senas whirpoolas blogesnis uz
>>> nauja blomberga vertinant skalbimo kokybe?
>>> "zalias" <pastas@kaimas.lt> wrote in message
>>> news:hgoebo$cff$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>>>> tarkim skalbimo kokybe labai gerai ir Ryga, jei skalbeja gera.
>>>>
>>>> On 2009.12.21 20:10, tomassaki wrote:
>>>>> Jeigu viatka _gerai_ atliktu savo funkcijas ir negestu, tai butu
>>>>> gerai.
>>>>> Bet kalbam apie normaliai veikiancias skalbenkes. Nepyk, bet
>>>>> Whirpoolas
>>>>> ir super duper nesirisa... Ir kuom jis buvo prastesnis uz dabartini
>>>>> Blomberga tarkim skalbimo kokybe?
>>>>> "zalias" <pastas@kaimas.lt> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hgod14$b24$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>>>>>> NU nu. idomiai cia. kogero viatka tada irgi visai gerai. Mano
>>>>>> ismestas
>>>>>> whirpoolas jau senokai laikau paseno, nors 2000 m buvo super duper.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2009.12.21 19:29, tomassaki wrote:
>>>>>>> Nu nelabai ten kas skalbenkese tobuleja, IMHO. Nebent marketingas.
>>>>>>> Maniske jau 6 metus sukasi ir nematau prekyboje kazko stebuklingai
>>>>>>> pasikeitusio.
>>>>>>> "zalias" <pastas@kaimas.lt> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:hgob18$94m$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>>>>>>>> laikas px. amzinu ju nera. o ir nereikia, nes per 5 metus
>>>>>>>> patobulejama
>>>>>>>> zenkliai, ir keisti reiketu ne del neveikimo, o del naujos geresnio
>>>>>>>> veikimo. ar laikote kad turkiskas blomberg neveiks 5 metus?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2009.12.21 18:55, Pjero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> laikas pakeis gera tamstos nuomone
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "zalias"<pastas@kaimas.lt> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:hgo5vk$3gs$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>>>>>>>>>> visai neseniai pirkau blomberg uz 1100 Lt. Kazkaip dar neradau
>>>>>>>>>> savo
>>>>>>>>>> pasirinkimo blogumo pozymiu. Pagaminta Turkijoj, bet siais
>>>>>>>>>> globalios
>>>>>>>>>> ekonomikos laikais manau jokio skirtumo kur ja kas kinietiskais
>>>>>>>>>> atsuktuvais rinko. Dirba tyliai, skalbia 7 kg. Tiesa grezia tik
>>>>>>>>>> 1000
>>>>>>>>>> aps,. bet mano atveju tai joks minusas, dziovinama negyvenamoj
>>>>>>>>>> patalpoj.
>>>>>>>>>> Butu net idomu isgirst kokia nors argumentuota neigiama nuomone
>>>>>>>>>> apie
>>>>>>>>>> toki daikta.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2009.12.21 17:32, AMB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> koki reiktu rinktis skalbenkes brenda? kaina ziuriu mazdaug iki
>>>>>>>>>>> 1200lt. ka
>>>>>>>>>>> rinktis eletroliux, samsung, beko ar dar koki velnia?
>>>>>>>>>>> reikalavimu
>>>>>>>>>>> kazkokiu
>>>>>>>>>>> tai nera, idejimas kad butu standartinis is priekio.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
>>>>>>>>>>> virus
>>>>>>>>>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>>>>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>>>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>>>
>>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature database 4706 (20091221) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4707 (20091221) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>