Yeap, tokius filmus reikia salej ziuret :) Inception varysiu antra syki treciadieni per jomajo ziuret, nes tikrai verta. -- Honda Civic '00 EK3 1.5 Vtec-E "Norw" <meilo@nera.lt> wrote in message news:i4sb5a$urt$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > Pasiseke, kad salej matei :) Vizualiai labai grazus tas Watchmen. > > Itariu reikia varyt i kina paziuret Inception kol dar rodo. The Dark Knight > tai nerealiai patiko. Itariu Nolanas ir cia pasistenge. > > "Kaksht" <ne_mano_mail@xxx.com> parašė naujienų > news:i4s7o4$sl7$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> Na Southland ir Watchmen tai lygintini tik is to kad ale apokaliptiniai >> filmai, ar bent veda prie to. O siaip Watchmen man asmeniskai vienas >> geriausiu filmu ever, sakyciau isejau is sales paveiktas taip pat kaip ir >> po Inception (su vau efektu) :) >> >> "Norw" <meilo@nera.lt> wrote in message >> news:i4pk2g$net$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> Perziurejau. Galiu pasakyt tas filmas yra vienas didelis "mindfuck" su >>> buriu >>> zvaigzdziu ir pigiais efektais. >>> Po Donnie Darko galvojau, kad rezisierius yra jaunasis genijus. Po >>> Southland >>> Tales ir The Box manau, kad rezisierius tiesiog toliau saudo tais paciais >>> soviniais, tik pastarieji du nelabai sekmingi. Kurybingas tas Richard >>> Kelly, bet deja per daug druskos sugadina patiekala. >>> >>> Kas nemate siulyciau geriau paziureti Watchmen >>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/ >>> Panasus "alternatyvus" pasaulis, istorija taip pat pasakojama vieno >>> veikeju, >>> persidenge siuzetai ir vizualiai idomus filmas. Ir sakyciau zymiai >>> idomesnis >>> ir daug geriau pavykes nei Southland Tales. >>> >>> >>> >>> "Kaksht" <kaksht@cianetikrasmuilas.com> parašė naujienų >>> news:i4jl34$sav$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405336/ >>>> >>>> Kazkaip prisiminiau sita sena filma ir nutariau priminti tiem kas nemate >>>> :) Siaip sunkus filmas ir tikrai nekiekvienam, daug kas nesupras, daug >>>> kam >>>> nepatiks, bet kam patiks - tam labai patiks. Man asmeniskai labai >>>> patiko, >>>> super istorija, super nuotaika perteikta filme, ir visi aktoriai labai >>>> gerai vaidina. >>>> >>>> Rekomenduoju! >>>> >>>> vienas komentaras is youtube >>>> "This movie was very under rated. It is a fantastic story which makes >>>> you >>>> think about you and your life style. The style of the film is also >>>> individual which I love." >>>> >>>> Papaste'insiu viena is review is imdb: >>>> This is the way the world ends. Not with a whimper, but with a bang. >>>> >>>> This is a film about all of the seemingly random events that lead up to >>>> the end of the world. And it's also a comedy. >>>> >>>> That says it all right there, doesn't it? >>>> >>>> When this film ended, I ran to tell every one I could find about it. The >>>> odd thing I found about it was that I ended nearly every one of these >>>> conversations with the following: >>>> >>>> "It was amazing, but don't see it. You won't like it." >>>> >>>> It's strange to hope that a film I feel so passionately about should not >>>> be seen by the very people I want to discuss it with. However, that's >>>> exactly the way I feel here. This film is not for everybody; in fact, >>>> there are only a precious few out of all of the people who see it that >>>> will even tolerate its existence. But you know what? That really isn't >>>> important. >>>> >>>> Art is subjective, and no matter how many times I bother to explain a >>>> difficult concept to somebody who hated this film, I realize that it >>>> will >>>> never work long before the conversation ends. The problem is that these >>>> difficult concepts are actually very simplistic: Richard Kelly had >>>> Dwayne >>>> Johnson spoof the stereotypical, apocalyptic action-hero throughout the >>>> film. This included over-dramatic readings of his lines, delayed >>>> reactions >>>> and odd vocal dynamics. >>>> >>>> What? You say that it wasn't intentional, and that it was just Johnson's >>>> poor acting skills? >>>> >>>> This is where the small-minded fail to grasp the most simplistic of >>>> concepts. The great analytical film student will analyze a crooked frame >>>> and declare the brilliance of its intent; they will say that this >>>> intentional error supports the themes of the piece. So why does the same >>>> not go for Southland Tales? >>>> >>>> Each one of these already-marked actors has broken out of their shells >>>> for >>>> this movie. The fact that everybody stereotypes them attests to Kelly's >>>> genius in assigning them the roles; however, it also proves how >>>> unfortunately small-minded today's modern audience has become. >>>> >>>> Was this film a mess? Absolutely, in every sense of the word. But was it >>>> a >>>> coherent mess? That's the real question, and I think that I can safely >>>> say >>>> that it is. This film is nowhere near as difficult to understand as >>>> anybody would have you believe. The concepts are straightforward and are >>>> practically dictated to you by the narrator; this becomes essential to >>>> the >>>> understanding of the story, as there is just way too much going on to >>>> take >>>> in on your own. However, instead of hindering the film, it makes these >>>> seemingly unrelated scenes string together into a true tapestry that is >>>> worth exploring. >>>> >>>> So, you know what? I'm going to go against my own advice and advise >>>> anybody and everybody who reads this review to go out and see this film. >>>> If you don't like it, don't come back to this website whining about it, >>>> because nobody here has the tolerance to explain things to you that you >>>> will never understand. No amount of discussion of cinematography, >>>> lighting >>>> or the fantastically haunting score by Moby is going to change the mind >>>> of >>>> an already jaded viewer. >>>> >>>> But maybe, just maybe, you will like it. You'll get a chance to >>>> experience >>>> something you're likely to rarely, if never, experience again. Because >>>> as >>>> all of us who enjoyed the film know: >>>> >>>> It had to be this way. >>>> -- >>>> Honda Civic '00 EK3 1.5 Vtec-E >>>> >