Pasiseke, kad salej matei :) Vizualiai labai grazus tas Watchmen. Itariu reikia varyt i kina paziuret Inception kol dar rodo. The Dark Knight tai nerealiai patiko. Itariu Nolanas ir cia pasistenge. "Kaksht" <ne_mano_mail@xxx.com> parašė naujienų news:i4s7o4$sl7$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > Na Southland ir Watchmen tai lygintini tik is to kad ale apokaliptiniai > filmai, ar bent veda prie to. O siaip Watchmen man asmeniskai vienas > geriausiu filmu ever, sakyciau isejau is sales paveiktas taip pat kaip ir > po Inception (su vau efektu) :) > > "Norw" <meilo@nera.lt> wrote in message > news:i4pk2g$net$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> Perziurejau. Galiu pasakyt tas filmas yra vienas didelis "mindfuck" su >> buriu >> zvaigzdziu ir pigiais efektais. >> Po Donnie Darko galvojau, kad rezisierius yra jaunasis genijus. Po >> Southland >> Tales ir The Box manau, kad rezisierius tiesiog toliau saudo tais paciais >> soviniais, tik pastarieji du nelabai sekmingi. Kurybingas tas Richard >> Kelly, bet deja per daug druskos sugadina patiekala. >> >> Kas nemate siulyciau geriau paziureti Watchmen >> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/ >> Panasus "alternatyvus" pasaulis, istorija taip pat pasakojama vieno >> veikeju, >> persidenge siuzetai ir vizualiai idomus filmas. Ir sakyciau zymiai >> idomesnis >> ir daug geriau pavykes nei Southland Tales. >> >> >> >> "Kaksht" <kaksht@cianetikrasmuilas.com> parašė naujienų >> news:i4jl34$sav$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405336/ >>> >>> Kazkaip prisiminiau sita sena filma ir nutariau priminti tiem kas nemate >>> :) Siaip sunkus filmas ir tikrai nekiekvienam, daug kas nesupras, daug >>> kam >>> nepatiks, bet kam patiks - tam labai patiks. Man asmeniskai labai >>> patiko, >>> super istorija, super nuotaika perteikta filme, ir visi aktoriai labai >>> gerai vaidina. >>> >>> Rekomenduoju! >>> >>> vienas komentaras is youtube >>> "This movie was very under rated. It is a fantastic story which makes >>> you >>> think about you and your life style. The style of the film is also >>> individual which I love." >>> >>> Papaste'insiu viena is review is imdb: >>> This is the way the world ends. Not with a whimper, but with a bang. >>> >>> This is a film about all of the seemingly random events that lead up to >>> the end of the world. And it's also a comedy. >>> >>> That says it all right there, doesn't it? >>> >>> When this film ended, I ran to tell every one I could find about it. The >>> odd thing I found about it was that I ended nearly every one of these >>> conversations with the following: >>> >>> "It was amazing, but don't see it. You won't like it." >>> >>> It's strange to hope that a film I feel so passionately about should not >>> be seen by the very people I want to discuss it with. However, that's >>> exactly the way I feel here. This film is not for everybody; in fact, >>> there are only a precious few out of all of the people who see it that >>> will even tolerate its existence. But you know what? That really isn't >>> important. >>> >>> Art is subjective, and no matter how many times I bother to explain a >>> difficult concept to somebody who hated this film, I realize that it >>> will >>> never work long before the conversation ends. The problem is that these >>> difficult concepts are actually very simplistic: Richard Kelly had >>> Dwayne >>> Johnson spoof the stereotypical, apocalyptic action-hero throughout the >>> film. This included over-dramatic readings of his lines, delayed >>> reactions >>> and odd vocal dynamics. >>> >>> What? You say that it wasn't intentional, and that it was just Johnson's >>> poor acting skills? >>> >>> This is where the small-minded fail to grasp the most simplistic of >>> concepts. The great analytical film student will analyze a crooked frame >>> and declare the brilliance of its intent; they will say that this >>> intentional error supports the themes of the piece. So why does the same >>> not go for Southland Tales? >>> >>> Each one of these already-marked actors has broken out of their shells >>> for >>> this movie. The fact that everybody stereotypes them attests to Kelly's >>> genius in assigning them the roles; however, it also proves how >>> unfortunately small-minded today's modern audience has become. >>> >>> Was this film a mess? Absolutely, in every sense of the word. But was it >>> a >>> coherent mess? That's the real question, and I think that I can safely >>> say >>> that it is. This film is nowhere near as difficult to understand as >>> anybody would have you believe. The concepts are straightforward and are >>> practically dictated to you by the narrator; this becomes essential to >>> the >>> understanding of the story, as there is just way too much going on to >>> take >>> in on your own. However, instead of hindering the film, it makes these >>> seemingly unrelated scenes string together into a true tapestry that is >>> worth exploring. >>> >>> So, you know what? I'm going to go against my own advice and advise >>> anybody and everybody who reads this review to go out and see this film. >>> If you don't like it, don't come back to this website whining about it, >>> because nobody here has the tolerance to explain things to you that you >>> will never understand. No amount of discussion of cinematography, >>> lighting >>> or the fantastically haunting score by Moby is going to change the mind >>> of >>> an already jaded viewer. >>> >>> But maybe, just maybe, you will like it. You'll get a chance to >>> experience >>> something you're likely to rarely, if never, experience again. Because >>> as >>> all of us who enjoyed the film know: >>> >>> It had to be this way. >>> -- >>> Honda Civic '00 EK3 1.5 Vtec-E >>>