Tema: Re: Southland Tales [2006]
Autorius: Kaksht
Data: 2010-08-23 01:18:44
Na Southland ir Watchmen tai lygintini tik is to kad ale apokaliptiniai filmai, ar bent veda prie to. O siaip Watchmen man asmeniskai vienas geriausiu filmu ever, sakyciau isejau is sales paveiktas taip pat kaip ir po Inception (su vau efektu) :)

"Norw" <meilo@nera.lt> wrote in message news:i4pk2g$net$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
> Perziurejau. Galiu pasakyt tas filmas yra vienas didelis "mindfuck" su buriu 
> zvaigzdziu ir pigiais efektais.
> Po Donnie Darko galvojau, kad rezisierius yra jaunasis genijus. Po Southland 
> Tales ir The Box manau, kad rezisierius tiesiog toliau saudo tais paciais 
> soviniais, tik pastarieji du nelabai sekmingi.  Kurybingas tas Richard 
> Kelly, bet deja per daug druskos sugadina patiekala.
> 
> Kas nemate siulyciau geriau paziureti Watchmen
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/
> Panasus "alternatyvus" pasaulis, istorija taip pat pasakojama vieno veikeju, 
> persidenge siuzetai ir vizualiai idomus filmas. Ir sakyciau zymiai idomesnis 
> ir daug geriau pavykes nei Southland Tales.
> 
> 
> 
> "Kaksht" <kaksht@cianetikrasmuilas.com> parašė naujienų 
> news:i4jl34$sav$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405336/
>>
>> Kazkaip prisiminiau sita sena filma ir nutariau priminti tiem kas nemate 
>> :) Siaip sunkus filmas ir tikrai nekiekvienam, daug kas nesupras, daug kam 
>> nepatiks, bet kam patiks - tam labai patiks. Man asmeniskai labai patiko, 
>> super istorija, super nuotaika perteikta filme, ir visi aktoriai labai 
>> gerai vaidina.
>>
>> Rekomenduoju!
>>
>> vienas komentaras is youtube
>> "This movie was very under rated. It is a fantastic story which makes you 
>> think about you and your life style. The style of the film is also 
>> individual which I love."
>>
>> Papaste'insiu viena is review is imdb:
>> This is the way the world ends. Not with a whimper, but with a bang.
>>
>> This is a film about all of the seemingly random events that lead up to 
>> the end of the world. And it's also a comedy.
>>
>> That says it all right there, doesn't it?
>>
>> When this film ended, I ran to tell every one I could find about it. The 
>> odd thing I found about it was that I ended nearly every one of these 
>> conversations with the following:
>>
>> "It was amazing, but don't see it. You won't like it."
>>
>> It's strange to hope that a film I feel so passionately about should not 
>> be seen by the very people I want to discuss it with. However, that's 
>> exactly the way I feel here. This film is not for everybody; in fact, 
>> there are only a precious few out of all of the people who see it that 
>> will even tolerate its existence. But you know what? That really isn't 
>> important.
>>
>> Art is subjective, and no matter how many times I bother to explain a 
>> difficult concept to somebody who hated this film, I realize that it will 
>> never work long before the conversation ends. The problem is that these 
>> difficult concepts are actually very simplistic: Richard Kelly had Dwayne 
>> Johnson spoof the stereotypical, apocalyptic action-hero throughout the 
>> film. This included over-dramatic readings of his lines, delayed reactions 
>> and odd vocal dynamics.
>>
>> What? You say that it wasn't intentional, and that it was just Johnson's 
>> poor acting skills?
>>
>> This is where the small-minded fail to grasp the most simplistic of 
>> concepts. The great analytical film student will analyze a crooked frame 
>> and declare the brilliance of its intent; they will say that this 
>> intentional error supports the themes of the piece. So why does the same 
>> not go for Southland Tales?
>>
>> Each one of these already-marked actors has broken out of their shells for 
>> this movie. The fact that everybody stereotypes them attests to Kelly's 
>> genius in assigning them the roles; however, it also proves how 
>> unfortunately small-minded today's modern audience has become.
>>
>> Was this film a mess? Absolutely, in every sense of the word. But was it a 
>> coherent mess? That's the real question, and I think that I can safely say 
>> that it is. This film is nowhere near as difficult to understand as 
>> anybody would have you believe. The concepts are straightforward and are 
>> practically dictated to you by the narrator; this becomes essential to the 
>> understanding of the story, as there is just way too much going on to take 
>> in on your own. However, instead of hindering the film, it makes these 
>> seemingly unrelated scenes string together into a true tapestry that is 
>> worth exploring.
>>
>> So, you know what? I'm going to go against my own advice and advise 
>> anybody and everybody who reads this review to go out and see this film. 
>> If you don't like it, don't come back to this website whining about it, 
>> because nobody here has the tolerance to explain things to you that you 
>> will never understand. No amount of discussion of cinematography, lighting 
>> or the fantastically haunting score by Moby is going to change the mind of 
>> an already jaded viewer.
>>
>> But maybe, just maybe, you will like it. You'll get a chance to experience 
>> something you're likely to rarely, if never, experience again. Because as 
>> all of us who enjoyed the film know:
>>
>> It had to be this way.
>> -- 
>> Honda Civic '00 EK3 1.5 Vtec-E
>>