Eik geriau fotkint :) On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:45:43 +0300, "obliarka" <none@ok.ok> wrote: >1.1 All you need is buy old second hand Canon xxxD, stick "L" lens on it and >go shootin. >1.2 By the way, Pentium 90MHz is 4303492049 times more capable than you need >for your post process. > > >2. high ISO without noise = Canon. Even Chuck Norris can't argue over this >one. > > > >"Kaksht" <kaksht@nera.uzbekistan> wrote in message >news:jmru1d$qun$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> Diskusija apie tai: >> http://boards.4chan.org/p/res/1595177 >> >> ir keletas IMO teisingu nuomoniu: >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> "Cameras that score 4303492049 times worse than either of these two are >> more than capable of producing amazingly beautiful results. >> >> This shit is pointless. Kind of like benchmarking computer RAM tRAS, tRCD, >> tRP, tRC latency specs against each other in SuperPi or something. You get >> huge differences in results that are not even barely noticeable in actual >> real-world use. >> >> Light, and optics are so much more important than this." >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> "Canon has made an excellent camera for most prosumers, while nikon made a >> camera for landscape and studio photographers. Its a good thing Nikon made >> such improvements in their sensor, but when the camera can't support stuff >> like high ISO without noise and a faster fps, its just a big drawback >> after drawback for a really good sensor (if you need fps and high iso >> noise performance that is). Also the file size is stupidly high (as >> expected), and thus would make it even less accessible to the general >> market seeing you not only have to buy a new camera, but most likely new >> memory cards to support more images" >