cheaper,but not for customer :)

On 2017.06.01 09:18, MRT wrote:
>>>>> PS. Kas liecia objektyvus - jie lyg ir truputi mazesni..
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flange_Focal_Length_(2_types_camera).PNG 
>>>
>>>
>>>> mazesi nes matrica 3/4 kazkuriu ten.
>>>
>>> o kazkuriu ten kitu matrica FF, tai ar didesni uz Canon EF-S mount'a?
> 
>>
>> kuriu ten FF ir mazesni objektyvai?
> 
> pasirodo tu FF didesnis uz EF-S ir net EF.. ok, klaidinantis 
> paveiksliukas..
> atrode, kad bent ant plastmases tarp stiklu ir bodzio turetu susitaupyt..
> kazkaip galvojau, kad tas paveiksliukas bent toki gabarita eliminuoja:
> https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1037218-REG/novoflex_nex_eos_manual_ef_lens_to_sony.html 
> 
> http://cdn.cameradebate.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/canon-eos-m-with-18-55-and-adapter-size-comparison1.jpg 
> 
> 
> bet griztant prie pirmuju - matrica 4/3, tai:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Four_Thirds_system#Micro_Four_Thirds_lenses 
> 
> Because the flange focal distance of Micro Four Thirds cameras are 
> shorter than DSLRs, most lenses are smaller and cheaper.
> 
> MFT shares the original image sensor size and specification with the 
> Four Thirds system, designed for DSLRs. Unlike Four Thirds, the MFT 
> system design specification does not provide space for a mirror box and 
> a pentaprism, which facilitates smaller body designs and a shorter 
> flange focal distance, and hence smaller lenses.
> Teoriskai tas "shorter flange focal distance" tarsi leistu "smaller 
> lenses"..
> Tik pagal gaminamus variantus kazkaip lengvai paklikinus kazkiek neradau 
> patvirtinimo.