o bet gi taciau tuo pasirodys tomas ir kiti vanios rubliovai, ir bus taip: ×åņūšå čėėžńņšąöčč ņīćī, źąź ķīāą˙ čäå˙ īćīšąųčāąåņ ÷åėīāåźą, ź ķåé ķå ļīäćīņīāėåķķīćī I Ļčńąņåėü: ß ļčńąņåėü! ×čņąņåėü: Ą ļī-ģīåģó, ņū ćīāķī! ļčńąņåėü ńņīčņ ķåńźīėüźī ģčķóņ, ļīņš˙ńøķķūé żņīé ķīāīé čäååé, č ļąäąåņ ēąģåšņāī | åćī āūķīń˙ņ II Õóäīęķčź: ß õóäīęķčź! Šąįī÷čé: Ą ļī-ģīåģó, ņū ćīāķī! õóäīęķčź ņóņ ęå ļīįėåäķåė, źąź ļīėīņķī, č źąź ņšīńņčķźą ēąźą÷ąėń˙, č ķåīęčäąķķī ńźīķ÷ąėń˙ | åćī āūķīń˙ņ III Źīģļīēčņīš: ß źīģļīēčņīš! Āąķ˙ Šóįėåā: Ą ļī-ģīåģó, ņū ćīāķī! źīģļīēčņīš, ņ˙ęåėī äūųą, ņąź č īńåė | åćī ķåīęčäąķķī āūķīń˙ņ IV Õčģčź: ß õčģčź! Ōčēčź: Ą ļī-ģīåģó, ņū ćīāķī! õčģčź ķå ńźąēąė įīėüųå ķč ńėīāą č ņ˙ęåėī šóõķóė ķą ļīė "Toxis@ze_yvil_place" <tox@work.ble> wrote in message news:hsb17f$faq$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > na, konservatyvumas yra viena, o didesne tolerancija/liberalumu kaip tik > dazhniausiai pasizhymi intelektualesni zhmones. (kad ir Fishel/Pottker > studijoj teigia, kad "Generally, higher IQ students of both sexes are more > liberal than medium IQ students"), matyt todel liberalai niekad nelaimi > jokiu rinkimu, nes ju elektoratas yra labai siauras:), ar Satishi Kanazawa > tyrimas, kuris rado kad "The Savanna-IQ Interaction Hypothesis, derived > from the Savanna Principle and a theory of the evolution of general > intelligence, suggests that more intelligent individuals may be more > likely to acquire and espouse evolutionarily novel values and preferences > (such as liberalism and atheism and, for men, sexual exclusivity) than > less intelligent individuals, but that general intelligence may have no > effect on the acquisition and espousal of evolutionarily familiar values. > Macro-level analyses show that nations with higher average intelligence > are more liberal (have greater highest marginal individual tax rate and, > as a result, lower income inequality), less religious (a smaller > proportion of the population believes in God or considers themselves > religious) and more monogamous. The average intelligence of a population > appears to be the strongest predictor of its level of liberalism, atheism > and monogamy."