cituoju:


"Historically, plasma had a technological and cost advantage in the big 
screens over LCD. Early on, plasma makers showed that their sets run on 
less energy than liquid-crystal-display TVs. But LCD makers are making 
bigger sets—and that might have swayed Pioneer to bail. No doubt the 
economic downturn, the strong yen, and this year's forecast for 
single-digit growth in TV sales (a mere 5% rise to 14.6 million units, 
according to DisplaySearch) made the decision easier. "



Plasmos pristabdomos DEL KRIZES ir del PAKLAUSOS nebuvimo, nes viska 
uzima LEVESNI LCD..

Ne pirmas atvejis istorijoje, kai pazangesne technologija nueina i 
seseli, nisa del kitu, net ir prastesniu produktu masiskumo ir pigumo 
(Betacam vs VHS pvz..)

padugne wrote:
> At 07 Jul 2009 14:17:23 +0300 Kranas wrote:
>>> bet plazma yra atgyvenusi technologija ir isimama is apyvartos (ES 
>>> reikalavimu energijos taupymu ir pan..).
>> Matosi, kad zmogus tik Lietuvos ziniasklaida ziuri/skaito, o toliau 
>> pasidometi "rankos nedaeina" :) Nusiramink, niekas nieko is apyvartos 
>> neisima. 
> 
> prasom, zinios is "toliau":
> 
> www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/feb2009/gb20090212_424440.htm