1) bent W3000 yra labai senas modelis, isleistas 2007-ais ( po jo dar buvo 
W4000, W4500 ir dabar naujas W5500 ), o P50X1, kiek Google radau - katik ( 
siu metu balandi ) isleistas ?

Tai neatrodo tau, kad lygint poros metu senumo LCD su katik isleista plazma 
gal biski nekorektiska ?

2) va kitas testas kur irgi lygina nauja LCD ( minetas W5500 )  ir su nauju 
TX-P42G10 ( gal labai nemusi, kad 2" skiriasi )

Panasonic TX-P42G10
Power Consumption
      Default [Standard] mode 181 watts*
      Calibrated [Standard] mode 235 watts
      Standby 1 watt

* The default factory settings in "Standard" [Viewing Mode] was unusually 
dim: luminance output measured at only 64 cd/m2 on a 100% stimulus windowed 
pattern. This is the reason why the power consumption of our Panasonic 
TX-P42G10 review sample was lower out-of-the-box than that after 
calibration.

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/panasonic-tx-p42g10-tx-p42g10b-20090415146.htm



Sony W5500

Power Consumption

      Default "Standard" [Picture Mode] 149 watts
      Calibrated [Cinema]/[Theatre] mode 106 watts
      Standby 15 watts with [Quick Start] engaged; <1 watt otherwise


http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/Sony-KDL40W5500/Calibration.htm



tai kazkaip stebulingai po kalibracijos 106 W vs 235 W plazmos nenaudai 
:-D

Jie turbut nemoka matuot ?

Arba saliski ?

Kuris is siu variantu ?  :-)








"abc" <ttddkk@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:gu3q8i$o0c$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
> Didziausias grozis ten matyt, kaip mazesni  LCD valgo daugiau uz didesni 
> (!!!) plazma
>
> t.y.
> Sony KDL40W3000 LCD 40" 218.56 W
> Sony KDL40V4150 LCD 40" 210.64 W
> Samsung LN46B530LCD 45.9" 184.53 W
> Sony KDL46V5100 LCD 46" 201.96 W
>
>
> ir stai
>
> Panasonic TC-P50X1 Plasma 49.9" 182.30 W
>
>> Toliau komentuokit patys :)
>