Nu iš kur gali būt geriau nei optika, jei per 5G pradžiai pereini per sharintą tarp krūvos userių eterį, o po to į optiką (visos stotys gi ant jos stovi). Optikoje (jei ne GPON'inė) to sharinto segmento nėra.

On 2023-11-02 19:09, MMX wrote:
> sakyčiau nemaži. Kažkur išskaičiau kad 5G 5ms blogesni nei optika, Ir > jitteris nemažas.
> > 2023-11-02 18:15, Dainiushas rašė:
>> $ ping 1.1.1.1
>> PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=66.1 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=47.5 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=13.4 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=250 time=11.9 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=250 time=13.7 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=250 time=15.8 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=250 time=6.77 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=250 time=15.7 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=250 time=17.6 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=250 time=15.6 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=250 time=22.5 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=250 time=19.2 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=250 time=9.67 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=250 time=19.3 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=250 time=33.5 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=250 time=14.3 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=250 time=19.9 ms
>> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=250 time=25.7 ms
>>
>> On 11/2/2023 5:35 PM, MMX wrote:
>>> Jei kas naudojate 5G. Kokie pingai tarkime iki 1.1.1.1
>>
>