Tema: Re: Academy Awards 82
Autorius: Name
Data: 2010-03-07 17:34:15
Koks skirtumas kas gaus tuos Oskarus, galima pagalvoti nuo to filmas pageres 
jei gaus arba pabloges jei negaus. Jei Oskarui nominuotam aktoriui/asmeniui 
kas susijes su konkreciu filmu svarbu tas Oskaro gavimas valio.
Eiliniam ziurovui idomu nebent moteru aktoriu sukneles ir koks dizaineris 
jas aprenge ir ka galbut aktorius arba aktore atsivede i Oskaru ceremonija 
kartu.

Director William Friedkin at the Hudson Union Society
Academy Awards as "the greatest promotion scheme that any industry ever 
devised for itself"
http://fora.tv/2009/02/24/Director_William_Friedkin_at_the_Hudson_Union_Society#William_Friedkin_Says_Oscars_Simply_a_Promotion_Scheme

Academy Award Criticism

The Oscars are generally voted on by members of the entertainment industry; 
thus, important films that have had the most people working on them 
generally become nominated. Director William Friedkin, an Oscar winner and 
producer of the Academy Awards, spoke critically of the awards at a 
conference in New York in 2009. He characterized the Academy Awards as "the 
greatest promotion scheme that any industry ever devised for itself".[38]

In addition, several winners critical of the Academy Awards have boycotted 
the ceremonies and refused to accept their Oscars. The first to do so was 
Dudley Nichols (Best Writing in 1935 for The Informer). Nichols boycotted 
the 8th Academy Awards ceremony because of conflicts between the Academy and 
the Writer's Guild.[39] George C. Scott became the second person to refuse 
his award (Best Actor in 1970 for Patton), at the 43rd Academy Awards 
ceremony. Scott explained, "The whole thing is a goddamn meat parade. I 
don't want any part of it."[40][41] The third winner, Marlon Brando, refused 
his award (Best Actor in 1972 for The Godfather), citing the film industry's 
discrimination and mistreatment of Native Americans. At the 45th Academy 
Awards ceremony, Brando sent Sacheen Littlefeather to read a 15-page speech 
detailing Brando's criticisms.[39]

It has been observed that several of the Academy Award winners – 
particularly Best Picture – have not stood the test of time or defeated 
worthier efforts. On They Shoot Pictures, Don't They's comprehensive 
database of the 1,000 most acclaimed films of all time, only eight of the 
first hundred ranked films have won the Best Picture award.[42] Tim Dirks, 
editor of AMC's filmsite.org, has written of the Academy Awards, 
"Unfortunately, the critical worth, artistic vision, cultural influence, and 
innovative qualities of many films are not given the same voting weight. 
Especially since the 80s, moneymaking 'formula-made' blockbusters with 
glossy production values have often been crowd-pleasing titans (and Best 
Picture winners), but they haven't necessarily been great films with depth 
or critical acclaim by any measure."[43] The Academy Awards have also come 
under criticism for having a bias towards certain types of performances and 
film genres. The Best Picture prize has never been given to a film noir, 
science fiction or an animated film; and rarely are horror, fantasy, comedy 
and westerns recognized by AMPAS. Acting prizes in certain years have been 
criticized for not recognizing superior performances so much as being 
awarded for sentimental reasons,[44] personal popularity,[45] atonement for 
past mistakes,[46] or presented as a "career honor" to recognize a 
distinguished nominee's entire body of work.[47]


"niece" <nice@nice.com> wrote in message 
news:hmqc07$2ai$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
> Nu tai kas laimes Oskarus?
>
> Filmas - Avataras
> Rezisierius - Bigelow Aktorius - Jeff Bridges Aktore - Bullock
> Antraplanis - Waltzas
> Antraplane - Monique
> Scenarijus - Basterdai
>
> Viskas kaip ir logiska...